In every organization, purchases happen every day - from recurring software subscriptions to urgent equipment buys. While most follow a structured, pre-approved purchase order (PO) process, not all do. Some bypass that route entirely. These are known as non-PO purchases. They’re often faster, sometimes necessary, but come with their own set of challenges.

‍

What this blog covers:

‍

• What is a non-PO (non purchase order) and how it fits into procurement workflows
• Key differences between purchase order (PO) and non-PO transactions
• A real-world case study of the traditional PO process
• When and why businesses opt for non-PO purchases
• Risks and compliance challenges of non-PO transactions
• Myths around approval delays in procurement workflows
• How technology simplifies PO and non-PO approvals
• How Spendflo helps manage all types of procurement spend
• Frequently asked questions on non purchase orders

‍

‍

What is a Non-PO (Non Purchase Order)?

A non-PO (non purchase order) is a transaction made without a formal purchase order. These are typically one-time or urgent purchases that bypass the standard procurement workflow, often relying on direct approvals or invoice processing after the purchase is made.

‍

‍

Key Differences Between PO and Non-PO Processes

While both PO and non-PO transactions serve the purpose of acquiring goods or services, the way they’re handled is very different. Understanding these differences is essential for finance and procurement teams looking to balance speed with control. Choosing between PO and non-PO routes often depends on how structured the overall procurement process is. Here’s a side-by-side comparison:

‍

‍

This comparison highlights why organizations often prefer POs for accountability, even though non-POs offer flexibility when speed is essential. 

‍

Case Study: The Traditional PO Process in Action

Let’s say a marketing team needs to purchase a new design tool. The process begins by submitting a purchase requisition detailing the tool, its cost, and the reason for the purchase. This request goes through a multi-level approval chain - usually involving the department head, finance, and procurement. Once approved, a PO number is generated to track the transaction and maintain consistency. 

‍

Once approved, a purchase order is created and sent to the vendor. The vendor delivers the product, followed by an invoice. The invoice typically references the purchase order number to ensure proper matching. Finance then matches the PO, invoice, and delivery receipt before processing payment. This step is typically handled by the accounts payable team to ensure accuracy and control. This structured workflow ensures accountability, budget alignment, and audit-readiness - but it can be time-consuming when speed is critical.

‍

When Urgency Strikes: A Real-World Look at Non-PO Purchases

Now picture this: a sales team urgently needs last-minute access to a webinar platform for a high-stakes client pitch. Waiting days for PO approvals isn’t an option. So, the team lead pulls out a corporate card, makes the purchase, and sends the invoice to finance later. Without a PO, invoice approval becomes more ad hoc and varies by department

‍

This is a classic non-PO scenario - fast, flexible, and sometimes necessary. But while it solves an immediate need, it also creates a visibility gap. Finance might not know about the spend until after it happens, making budgeting, forecasting, and compliance a lot more complicated in the long run.

‍

Risks and Challenges of Relying on Non-PO Transactions

While non-PO purchases can offer flexibility and speed, they come with trade-offs that can impact financial control, compliance, and long-term planning. Here are the major risks businesses face when relying too heavily on non-PO transactions:

‍

‍

Limited Visibility Into Spend

Finance teams often have no insight into non-PO purchases until after the fact, making it difficult to track expenses or enforce budget controls. Late access to invoice data adds another layer of complexity to spend management. 

‍

Higher Risk of Fraud or Duplicate Payments

Without formal approvals or documentation, it’s easier for duplicate invoices, unauthorized vendors, or fraudulent transactions to slip through unnoticed. Inconsistent payment terms can also lead to missed discounts or strained vendor relationships. 

‍

Lack of Audit Trail and Compliance Issues

Non-PO transactions usually lack the structured documentation required for audits, increasing the risk of compliance gaps with both internal policies and external regulations.

‍

Inaccurate Financial Forecasting

Since non-PO spend isn’t captured in real time, it can distort budgeting, cash flow planning, and overall financial visibility. Delays in invoice matching further complicate forecasting and close cycles. 

‍

Debunking Myths: Approval Routing Isn’t Always the Bottleneck

It’s easy to blame approval workflows when procurement feels slow. The perception is that layers of sign-offs delay purchases - and in some cases, that’s true. But the real bottlenecks often lie elsewhere.

‍

Manual handoffs between teams, lack of clear roles, or missing vendor data can slow things down far more than the approval itself. In fact, well-designed approval workflows can speed things up by removing ambiguity and ensuring accountability. The myth that approvals are the problem overlooks the bigger picture: it’s not the workflow, it’s how it’s implemented.

‍

How Technology Simplifies PO and Non-PO Approval Workflows

Managing both PO and non-PO transactions manually can lead to bottlenecks, errors, and oversight. Even something as simple as a delayed purchase request can create downstream issues in spend control. But with the right technology, businesses can streamline workflows, reduce friction, and maintain control - without slowing things down. Here’s how:

‍

‍

Automated Approval Routing

Modern procurement tools allow teams to set up dynamic approval flows based on spend thresholds, departments, or vendor types - no more chasing signatures or waiting on email chains.

‍

Real-Time Budget Checks and Thresholds

Finance teams can instantly validate if a request fits within budget, flagging issues before the spend happens. This reduces errors and keeps departments financially accountable.

‍

Visibility Across PO and Non-PO Spend

With everything centralized, stakeholders can track all types of spend in one place. Automation tools can flag policy violations and send real-time alerts to approvers. Whether it’s a planned PO or an urgent non-PO expense, nothing falls through the cracks.

‍

Audit-Ready Digital Records

Every action - from request to approval to payment - is recorded and searchable. This makes it easier to trace vendor invoices and ensure compliance with internal policies. This ensures a full audit trail, supports compliance, and simplifies financial reporting.

‍

How Spendflo Helps Manage All Types of Spend

Spendflo gives finance and procurement teams full visibility into both PO and non-PO transactions - all in one place. This visibility helps the AP department streamline reconciliation and payment tracking. Whether it’s a planned vendor renewal or a last-minute tool purchase, Spendflo’s platform ensures every dollar is tracked, approved, and optimized. Transactions can be tagged to specific cost centers, improving budget accountability. 

‍

With automated approval workflows, Slack and email integrations, and centralized contract intelligence, teams can move faster without losing control. From renewals to rogue spend, Spendflo brings structure to every kind of purchase.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions on non purchase order

‍

What is the difference between PO and non-PO invoices?

PO invoices are linked to a formal purchase order and go through a structured approval process before the purchase. Non-PO invoices are generated without a PO and are usually processed after the purchase has already been made.

‍

When should a company use a non-PO process?

Non-PO processes are typically used for urgent, low-value, or one-time purchases where going through the full PO workflow would slow things down unnecessarily.

‍

What are the risks of using non-PO purchases?

The main risks include lack of spend visibility, weak audit trails, increased chances of duplicate or unauthorized payments, and difficulties with budget tracking and compliance.

‍

Can non-PO transactions be automated?

Yes, modern procurement platforms can automate non-PO approvals, flag exceptions, and log all transactions - ensuring visibility and control without sacrificing speed. Integration with your ERP system ensures this data flows into broader financial operations seamlessly. 

‍