Compare Ramp vs ZipHQ to discover which procurement software fits your business best. Explore features, automation capabilities, integrations, and scalability. Plus, see how Spendflo stacks up as the smarter alternative for unified spend management and renewals.
The Ramp vs ZipHQ debate centers around how each platform simplifies procurement and spend control. Ramp offers a finance-first approach to spend management with built-in cards, bill payments, and expense automation. ZipHQ, meanwhile, focuses on intake-to-pay procurement workflows for fast approvals and compliance. This guide compares both tools -and Spendflo - across features, pricing, and ROI to help you choose the best procurement solution for 2025.
In this blog, you’ll learn:
- What Ramp and ZipHQ are, and how their procurement models differ.
- A detailed feature-by-feature comparison, including automation, integrations, and analytics.
- The pros and cons of each procurement platform.
- How to evaluate pricing, implementation time, and ROI.
- Why businesses are switching to Spendflo for streamlined procurement and spend visibility.
Feature Differences: Ramp vs ZipHQ vs Spendflo
Here’s how Ramp procurement, ZipHQ procurement, and Spendflo procurement software compare across key capabilities.
Ramp vs Zip: Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature |
Ramp |
ZipHQ |
Spendflo |
| Best For |
Finance teams managing expenses and payments. |
Procurement teams focusing on intake and approvals. |
Teams unifying intake, renewals, and spend management in one platform. |
| Procurement Model |
Finance-first spend and expense management. |
Intake-to-pay procurement automation. |
End-to-end intake-to-procure with SaaS optimization. |
| Security & Compliance |
SOC 2 compliant, spend limits, and audit controls. |
SOC 2 certified, with vendor risk and approval tracking. |
SOC 2 Type II certified, audit-ready compliance visibility. |
| Integrations |
QuickBooks, NetSuite, and banking tools. |
ERP and collaboration tools like Slack, NetSuite, and Workday. |
Deep integrations with NetSuite, Coupa, Ironclad, Jira, and Slack. |
| Automation & Workflows |
Automates expenses, reimbursements, and bill payments. |
Automates intake workflows with dynamic approvals. |
Automates intake, renewals, and approval flows with AI-powered optimization. |
| Vendor Onboarding |
Basic vendor setup and card management. |
Vendor onboarding with security questionnaires. |
Centralized vendor onboarding and contract visibility. |
| Analytics & Reporting |
Real-time expense tracking and financial insights. |
Request-level tracking and cycle-time analytics. |
Complete spend analytics across SaaS, vendors, and renewals. |
| Implementation Time |
2–6 weeks for mid-sized teams. |
4–8 weeks with admin configuration. |
2–4 weeks, no-code setup. |
| ROI Focus |
Cost savings via expense control and automation. |
Faster approvals, reduced bottlenecks. |
Proven 3× ROI via automation, SaaS savings, and renewals management. |
Verdict:
While Ramp procurement offers tight expense and payment automation and ZipHQ procurement tool excels in intake workflows, Spendflo procurement software delivers a holistic view - combining automation, renewals, and SaaS cost optimization in one scalable solution.
Pricing Comparison: Ramp vs ZipHQ vs Spendflo
| Pricing & Cost Factors |
Ramp |
ZipHQ |
Spendflo |
| Pricing Model |
Usage-based; includes cards, payments, and expense management. |
Intake-first model based on workflows and integrations. |
Transparent, scalable plans for procurement and SaaS spend management. |
| Implementation & Change Management |
Minimal setup; quick adoption. |
4–8 weeks with configuration support. |
Guided onboarding with migration assistance. |
| Admin Overhead |
Low; finance-led management. |
Moderate; requires procurement admin oversight. |
Low; no-code workflows managed by finance or procurement teams. |
| Integrations |
Accounting and banking APIs. |
ERP and collaboration tools. |
ERP, CLM, ITSM, and finance integrations. |
| Security & Compliance |
SOC 2 compliant, spend limits, card controls. |
SOC 2 certified, vendor approval tracking. |
SOC 2 Type II, audit-ready workflows. |
| ROI Focus |
Automates payments and reimbursements for faster ROI. |
Streamlines intake approvals to reduce cycle times. |
Delivers 3× ROI through automation, renewals, and SaaS optimization. |
Pros and Cons of Ramp
Pros
- Strong spend management and card-based automation.
- Simple setup with quick adoption.
- Real-time expense tracking for finance visibility.
- Great for small and mid-sized finance teams.
Cons
- Limited procurement automation.
- No renewal or contract tracking.
- Lacks deep vendor management capabilities.
Best For: Companies prioritizing expense control and payment automation over full procurement workflows.
Pros and Cons of ZipHQ
Pros
- Centralized intake and request tracking.
- Simplifies approvals with configurable workflows.
- Easy to implement; integrates with Slack and ERP tools.
Cons
- Limited procurement depth and vendor management.
- No built-in spend optimization or renewals tracking.
- Better suited for mid-market teams than large enterprises.
Best For: Teams seeking a lightweight, intake-focused procurement workflow tool.
Why Businesses Switch to Spendflo from Ramp and Zip
While Ramp and Zip streamline parts of the procurement process, businesses choose Spendflo for complete spend visibility, compliance confidence, and higher ROI.
With Spendflo, you can:
- Track SaaS Spending: Real-time visibility into costs and usage.
- Automate Vendor Management: Manage renewals, negotiations, and compliance effortlessly.
- Simplify Integrations: Connect with ERP, CLM, and collaboration tools seamlessly.
- Maximize ROI: Achieve measurable savings with benchmark data and automation.
- Migration Support: Move from Ramp or Zip smoothly with guided onboarding and expert implementation.
“Spendflo helped us optimize SaaS spend and expand licenses at a lower cost — with full confidence we’re not overpaying.”
– VP Finance, Acumatica
Book a demo today to see how Spendflo can transform your procurement and spend management strategy.
FAQs
1. What is Ramp?
Ramp is a spend management and procurement tool built to help finance teams automate expense tracking, bill payments, and reimbursement workflows. It streamlines company-wide spending with corporate cards, approval routing, and real-time reporting. Ramp procurement features are designed primarily for finance operations, focusing on budget control, payment automation, and visibility into overall spend. It integrates with accounting systems like QuickBooks, NetSuite, and Xero, making it ideal for teams seeking tighter financial oversight.
For organizations that later need deeper procurement automation or renewal visibility, tools like Spendflo often complement Ramp’s finance-first capabilities.
2. What is Zip?
Zip is an intake-to-pay procurement software that centralizes purchase requests, approvals, and vendor onboarding in one platform. It helps employees initiate requests easily, routes them automatically to relevant approvers, and maintains visibility across departments. Zip procurement workflows connect with ERP and collaboration tools such as Slack, Workday, and NetSuite to enhance cross-functional alignment.
Teams use Zip to improve procurement compliance and reduce bottlenecks in approval cycles. However, some growing organizations pair it with tools like Spendflo to gain added insights into renewals, SaaS spending, and cost optimization.
3. What’s the difference between Ramp and Zip?
The key difference lies in focus. Ramp procurement emphasizes financial automation, covering expenses, cards, and bill payments—while Zip procurement tool focuses on procurement workflows like intake management, vendor onboarding, and approvals.
In simple terms:
- Ramp helps teams control and reconcile spend.
- Zip helps teams manage and approve purchases.
Organizations that outgrow finance-only tools or need renewal tracking often look to integrated procurement platforms like Spendflo, which bridge the gap between spend management and procurement visibility.
4. Which is better for mid-market companies?
It depends on priorities.
- Ramp suits mid-market companies with finance-led workflows, focusing on quick payments, reimbursements, and expense automation.
- Zip fits procurement-led teams that require structured intake processes, compliance checks, and vendor collaboration.
If your business needs both - streamlined financial approvals and visibility into contracts or renewals - platforms like Spendflo offer a more holistic approach to managing procurement and SaaS expenses together.
5. Why choose Spendflo over Ramp or Zip?
While Ramp and Zip each address specific parts of the procurement lifecycle, Spendflo brings them together under one system. It combines intake-to-procure automation, contract and renewal management, and SaaS spend optimization - all while integrating with ERPs, CLMs, and collaboration tools.
Many teams use Spendflo when they want deeper visibility across both procurement and software spending, without managing multiple disjointed systems. The result is stronger compliance, clearer insights, and measurable ROI across their procurement stack.