When it comes to procurements, both cost savings and cost avoidance strategies (though used interchangeably) have their merits. Companies are always looking for ways to optimize their overall spend, and these two approaches offer distinct paths to that goal. The reality is, the best procurement strategies often involve a mix of both cost avoidance and cost savings tactics. Finding that perfect balance is going to take a deep understanding of your software needs, usage patterns, and spend data. It requires some rigorous experimentation and iteration.  It takes continuous testing and refinement—but the result is a more efficient and cost-effective procurement process.

‍

While these principles apply broadly across procurement, they are especially critical in SaaS procurement, where overspending and underutilization are common.

‍
‍

Cost Avoidance Vs Cost Savings in Procurement

— Cost avoidance is about preventing unnecessary expenses before they happen. It's a proactive strategy that can help companies steer clear of overspending. But it's not always easy to predict and prevent every potential cost pitfall.

‍

— Cost savings, on the other hand,focuses on actively reducing existing expenses. It delivers more tangible, measurable results. And in many cases, it's the more impactful approach when it comes to optimizing procurement costs. 

‍

These strategies are especially important in SaaS procurement, where spend visibility is often low and cost overruns are common.

‍

What is Cost Avoidance?

Cost avoidance refers to strategies that prevent future expenses rather than reducing current costs. It includes actions like negotiating better terms, avoiding price increases, and optimizing processes. Cost avoidance focuses on long-term savings by mitigating risks and managing potential financial impacts effectively.

‍

When you're managing your company's expenses, cost avoidance is a strategy you can employ to prevent unnecessary costs before they even occur. It's about being proactive and identifying potential expenses that can be eliminated or reduced before they hit your budget. Usually, cost avoidance can take many forms. Let's say you're considering purchasing a new software tool for your team. Before making the purchase, you might do a thorough needs assessment to ensure that the tool is truly necessary and that there isn't a more cost-effective solution already available. Or, you might negotiate with the vendor for a lower price or more favorable contract terms.

‍

You might also look for ways to avoid costs by optimizing your existing resources. Say, you might realize that you're paying for software licenses that aren't being used, and you could avoid that cost by redistributing those licenses to employees who need them.

‍
‍

What is Cost Savings?

Cost savings is a strategic approach to optimizing your company's expenses by actively reducing existing costs. Unlike cost avoidance, which focuses on preventing unnecessary expenses before they occur, cost savings targets current spending and seeks ways to lower it.

‍

Here's a concise outline of the steps you can follow to achieve cost savings in your organization:

‍

1. Analyze spending:

   - Review financial statements and identify top expense categories and conduct a thorough audit of current costs

‍

2. Set cost reduction targets:

   - Determine realistic goals for each expense category to prioritize areas with the highest potential for savings

‍

3. Develop a cost savings plan:

   - Outline specific strategies and action items and establish metrics to measure progress

‍
‍
Need a rough estimate of how much you can save before going further?

‍

Get a free savings analysis from Spendflo’s SaaS buying experts and learn how much you’re guaranteed to save. 

‍

‍Get a free Cost Savings Analysis now!
‍

Difference Between Cost Avoidance and Cost Savings

‍

‍

How to Calculate Cost Savings

Calculating cost savings in procurement is essential for tracking the impact of your negotiations and spend strategies. The most common method is to compare the original, pre-negotiated cost with the final amount agreed upon after procurement efforts. 

‍

Cost savings as an amount: 

Use this simple formula: Initial proposed cost – Final contracted cost = Cost savings amount 

‍

This tells you the total amount saved through negotiation or smarter buying. 

‍

Cost savings as a percentage: 

If you prefer to report savings in percentage terms, use this method: (Initial proposed cost – Final contracted cost) / Initial proposed cost × 100 = Cost savings percentage 

‍

This percentage reflects how much of a reduction you achieved compared to the original price. 

‍

While some procurement calculations can be more complex - especially with bundled deals or long-term contracts - these basic formulas are the foundation for measuring cost savings effectively. 

‍

‍

Benefits of Cost Savings

Data-led negotiation

When you start using data-led negotiation, you're not just saving money – you're gaining a competitive edge. By really understanding your SaaS usage and leveraging that data in vendor negotiations, you can optimize your licenses and pricing in a way that aligns perfectly with your business needs. 

‍

Strategic sourcing

Strategic sourcing is another powerful way to drive cost savings, but it's about more than just getting the best deals. By consolidating your spend and building strong relationships with key vendors, you're creating opportunities for long-term value creation. You're not just cutting costs – you're optimizing your entire SaaS ecosystem to support your business goals. And when you have a holistic view of your spend, you can make smarter decisions that benefit your whole organization.

‍

Tactical Contract renewal

Being proactive and tactical about renewals can make a huge difference. When you stay on top of deadlines and use data to guide your decisions, you're not just avoiding last-minute scrambles – you're putting yourself in a position to negotiate the best possible terms. And by rightsizing your contracts based on actual needs, you're ensuring that you're not paying for more than you actually use.

‍

Streamlining intake

When you have a centralized, automated approach to SaaS acquisitions, you're not just reducing rogue spending – you're creating a more efficient, transparent, and compliant process that benefits everyone. And by leveraging powerful tools and integrating your procurement and financial data, you're gaining incredible visibility into your spend. That means smarter decisions and better outcomes across the board.

‍

Limiting SaaS bloat 

SaaS Bloat is a problem for a lot of organizations. But by being proactive and data-driven about your application portfolio, you can keep things lean and mean. By regularly auditing and rationalizing your apps, you're ensuring that you're not wasting money on underutilized or redundant tools.

‍

‍

Bottom line: Which is the right one for you?

— Cost avoidance is most suitable for organizations who:

1. Are experiencing rapid growth or significant changes in their business needs

2. Have a complex or dynamic SaaS ecosystem with frequently evolving requirements

3. Need to maintain a high degree of agility and flexibility in their software stack

This may include startups, scale-ups, and businesses in fast-paced or disruptive industries where SaaS needs are constantly changing.
‍

— Cost savings is most suitable for organizations who:

1. Have a mature and stable SaaS ecosystem with well-established processes

2. Have a clear understanding of their SaaS usage patterns and can identify areas of inefficiency

3. Want to optimize their existing SaaS spend without compromising on functionality or quality

4. Prioritize tangible, short-term cost reductions and efficiency improvements

5. Have a strong focus on bottom-line impact and ROI

This may include larger enterprises, established SMBs, and businesses in more stable or predictable industries where SaaS needs are relatively consistent over time.

‍

‍

How to calculate cost avoidance?

Cost avoidance can be a bit trickier to calculate than cost savings because it deals with expenses that were never incurred - making them less visible on financial statements. However, it’s still measurable with the right context and benchmarks.

‍

Cost avoidance as an amount:

Use this general formula: Anticipated future cost – Actual incurred cost = Cost avoidance amount

‍

For example, if a vendor planned to increase their price by 10% but you negotiated to keep the original rate, the difference between the expected increase and the actual spend counts as cost avoidance.

‍

Cost avoidance as a percentage:

‍

You can also express cost avoidance as a percentage to show impact relative to expected spend: (Anticipated future cost – Actual cost) / Anticipated future cost × 100 = Cost avoidance percentage

‍

This calculation is especially useful for reporting procurement impact when avoiding price hikes, renewing contracts without added costs, or preventing unnecessary purchases altogether.

‍

Although cost avoidance isn’t always reflected directly in budgets, it plays a crucial role in long-term spend control and strategic procurement planning.

‍

‍

Benefits of Cost Avoidance?

Cost avoidance is a proactive approach that helps organizations steer clear of future unnecessary expenses. While it may not always show up directly on financial reports, its impact on long-term savings and operational efficiency is significant.

‍

Here are the key benefits of cost avoidance in procurement:

‍

1. Prevents Budget Overruns

By identifying and mitigating potential cost increases early, cost avoidance helps teams stay within budget and avoid last-minute financial surprises. It ensures that spending stays aligned with planned financial goals. Over time, this leads to more predictable and manageable procurement cycles.

‍

2. Improves Contract Efficiency

Cost avoidance often stems from smart contract negotiations - like locking in rates or avoiding auto-renewals at inflated prices - leading to more favorable terms over time. It promotes proactive management of vendor contracts and pricing structures. This helps organizations maximize value from every contract signed.

3. Enhances Strategic Planning

When procurement teams regularly avoid costs, it enables better forecasting and financial planning, giving leadership clearer visibility into future spend commitments. This foresight leads to more confident decision-making and long-term alignment with business goals. Cost avoidance turns procurement into a strategic advantage, not just a cost center. 

‍

4. Reduces Operational Waste

Avoiding unnecessary purchases, duplicate tools, or inflated pricing ensures that every dollar spent adds real value - minimizing waste across departments. It streamlines purchasing behaviors and eliminates excess spending. This directly improves organizational efficiency and resource utilization.

‍

5. Boosts Vendor Leverage

Consistently identifying cost avoidance opportunities strengthens your negotiation position with vendors, allowing you to push for better terms and prevent unnecessary upselling. It encourages suppliers to compete for your business with more favorable offers. This leverage is especially valuable in high-volume or long-term vendor relationships.

‍
‍

How Spendflo helps effectively avoid unnecessary procurement costs and also saves on your SaaS

‍

Spendflo’s Assisted Buying is designed to help you take control of your SaaS ecosystem and avoid unnecessary procurement costs. It provides complete visibility into your SaaS spend, data-driven optimization recommendations, streamlined procurement workflows, proactive budget management, and continuous improvement capabilities. With Spendflo, you can eliminate hidden costs, rightsizing licenses, negotiate better deals, and set your SaaS procurements up for success.

‍

Curious to try?

Book a Free Demo here

‍

Frequently Asked Questions on Cost Savings vs Avoidance in Procurement

What is the difference between cost savings and cost avoidance in procurement?

The key difference between cost savings and cost avoidance in procurement lies in timing and visibility. Cost savings refer to reductions in actual, measurable expenses - such as negotiating a lower price. Cost avoidance focuses on preventing potential future costs, like avoiding a vendor’s price hike. 

‍

Why is cost savings in procurement more measurable than cost avoidance?

Cost savings in procurement is easier to measure because it’s based on actual transactions and finalized costs. You can clearly calculate savings by comparing initial quotes with final negotiated prices. On the other hand, cost avoidance involves hypothetical costs that were never incurred, making them harder to track and report consistently.

‍

How can procurement teams implement cost avoidance strategies effectively?

To implement cost avoidance in procurement, teams must be proactive. This includes conducting early vendor negotiations, renewing contracts before rate increases, and forecasting future needs. Using market benchmarks and supplier risk assessments can also help avoid unnecessary costs. Cost avoidance in procurement is about staying ahead of potential financial risks. 

‍

Which is more important—cost savings or cost avoidance in procurement?

Both cost savings and cost avoidance in procurement play important roles depending on the organization's maturity and goals. Cost savings offers immediate, tangible benefits, ideal for short-term ROI. Cost avoidance, while less visible, supports long-term stability by preventing inflated costs. A balanced approach ensures efficient and strategic procurement management.

‍