An AI contract drafting agent can take the deal inputs, such as parties, term, fees, services and renewal rules, and select the matching agreement type from the clauses your legal team has approved.
Takes agreed commercial terms and the contract type.
Selects the approved template or clause set.
Inserts parties, dates, prices and terms into the draft.
Flags terms that fall outside approved language.
Legal reviews, edits and decides what is sent.
Saves the draft with its source and approvals.
It can fill the draft with those details and flag items it cannot complete, for example a missing party address or a payment term outside the usual range.
It can list where the draft departs from the standard position, so the reviewer sees at a glance which clauses need attention instead of reading every line.
Drafting from scratch or from an old file is slow, and small copy errors carry real commercial consequences.
Teams copy a past contract that contains terms from a different deal.
The same clause is worded differently across agreements, which complicates later management.
Names, dates and amounts typed by hand are easy to get wrong.
Every request reaches the same small team, so routine drafts wait behind complex ones.
Collect parties, scope, term, fees, renewal and any special terms from the request.
Select the agreement type and approved clauses that fit the deal.
Fill in the deal details and mark fields that are missing or unclear.
Note where the draft differs from your standard position and why.
Present the draft and a short gap list to legal or the contract owner.
Bring a small sample and watch Flo work through it.
| Aspect | By hand | With the agent |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Drafts begin from old contracts copied across. | Drafts begin from the approved base for the contract type. |
| Data entry | Parties, dates and amounts are typed in by hand. | Agreed terms are filled in from the deal record. |
| Fallbacks | Off-policy language slips in unnoticed. | Terms outside approved language are marked with the nearest clause. |
| Review load | Lawyers fix typos and missing fields. | Lawyers spend their time on judgement, not clean-up. |
| Trail | Nobody can say where a clause came from. | Each clause shows whether it came from the approved base or an edit. |
| If | Then | Who decides |
|---|---|---|
| The deal matches a standard contract type | Use the approved base and fill in the terms | Legal reviews |
| A requested term has no approved wording | Insert a marker and ask for legal language | Legal counsel drafts |
| A required field is missing from the deal record | List it and ask the buyer | Buyer |
| The counterparty is in a special category | Raise a flag for added clauses | Legal counsel |
| Commercial terms conflict with each other | Show the conflict before drafting | Buyer resolves |
| The contract value is high or sensitive | Route to senior review | Legal lead |
The other side may insist on its own form. The agent compares it against the approved base and the lawyer decides whether to proceed on their paper.
A deal may need a master agreement plus order forms. The agent drafts the parts together and lists how they refer to one another for the lawyer to check.
Governing law may change the needed wording. The agent uses the clause set for the stated law and flags any gap for legal.
Commercial terms may change after a draft exists. The agent updates affected clauses and marks every change for review.
Talk it through with the team. We will map it to your steps and show where a person stays in control.
Start with one standard type, such as a basic services agreement.
Legal compares agent drafts with their own and notes differences.
Add approved wording where markers appeared often.
Extend to more types while legal still approves each draft.
It indicates how well the drafts match your standards. A low figure points to gaps in the clause library or incomplete deal inputs.
Quick answers to what people ask most about contract drafting.
Book a demoIt is the preparation of a written agreement that sets out the parties, obligations, price and terms of a deal. A good draft reflects the agreed commercial terms in approved legal language.
No. It can assemble a first draft from approved material and flag gaps. A lawyer or authorised reviewer checks and approves the final text.
From the clause library and standard agreements your legal team supplies. It should not invent clauses outside that material.
It is best suited to repeatable agreement types with approved standard documents in your own library. Unusual or high-value deals still need a lawyer to draft or heavily edit.
An AI agent for contract renewal is software that tracks contract end dates and notice periods, alerts owners ahead of deadlines, and prepares the information needed to decide whether to renew, change or cancel.
→Contract redlining is marking up a contract to show proposed changes against a reference text or position.
→An AI contract obligation agent is software that extracts what each party has agreed to do from a contract, such as deliverables, deadlines, usage commitments and pricing, and tracks whether it is being met.
→An AI contract intelligence agent is software that reads contracts to extract key terms, summarise them, compare versions and flag clauses that depart from your playbook.
→Bring a small sample of real items. We will show what Flo handles on its own and where it hands over to your team.
